The importance of savings and investment (Part III)

In Parts I and II of this four part blog, we went back to first principles of savings, investment and trade. We then gave consideration to the trajectories of savings and investment of the US to see if we could make any sensible assessments of the likely trajectory of its current account and the US dollar. We concluded that the significant fiscal stimulus recently effected by President Trump will likely increase the US the current account deficit and result in downward pressure on the US dollar in the near-term.

So who will import Trump’s demand?

We have established a reasonable hypothesis that the result of the US fiscal stimulus will be to widen its current account deficit. This is analogous to “exporting demand”. And, by definition, the increase in the US current account deficit must be matched by corresponding increases in current account surplus economies.

At this point it is worth recalling the approximate relativities in the size of the major economic blocs. Essentially, 1.0% of US GDP equates to approximately:

  • 6% of Eurozone GDP;
  • 7% of Chinese GDP; and
  • 8% of Japanese GDP.

 

GDP of Major Economic Blocs (2016, US$ Billions)

Source: Bloomberg

From the analysis above, we believe we can rule out China as a major beneficiary of a widening US current account deficit. Essentially, we believe a strengthening Chinese consumer will keep a lid on the Chinese savings rate from rising sharply.

So who will import Trump’s demand?

Most likely the Eurozone and Japan, in our estimation. Both economies have experienced accelerated economic growth in recent years, buoyed by extraordinarily accommodative monetary policies. And we see no reason for additional fiscal stimulus at this point which could reduce their national savings rates.

Indeed, quite the opposite. Should monetary policies normalise in these economies, this would arguably reduce domestic consumption, increase domestic savings and increase current account surpluses. All of the above would result in upward pressure on these currencies.

Eurozone & Japan: Domestic Currency vs Current Account (% of GDP)

Source: Bloomberg

Andrew Macken is Chief Investment Officer with Montaka Global Investments. To learn more about Montaka, please call +612 7202 0100.

 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Our Montaka Global Long Only strategy strives to act as a core, high conviction, global portfolio holding. Consistent with the long portfolios in our Montaka strategies, this offering is focused on owning the world’s high quality, undervalued businesses – and cash when appropriate – to outperform its benchmark.

Our Montaka Active Extension strategy strives for maximised return over the long-term. Owning the Montaka long portfolio typically scaled up to approximately 130 percent - and the Montaka short portfolio typically scaled down to approximately 30 percent – this strategy results in a net market exposure of approximately 100 percent most of the time.

Our Montaka variable net strategy strives for significant downside protection – but with minimal upside reduction. Focused on owning the world’s great and growing businesses when they are undervalued, while managing a portfolio of short positions in businesses that are deteriorating, misperceived, and overvalued, this strategy is our flagship long-short

Our
Strategies

Our Strategies

Our Montaka Global Long Only strategy strives to act as a core, high conviction, global portfolio holding. Consistent with the long portfolios in our Montaka strategies, this offering is focused on owning the world’s high quality, undervalued businesses – and cash when appropriate – to outperform its benchmark.

Our Montaka Active Extension strategy strives for maximised return over the long-term. Owning the Montaka long portfolio typically scaled up to approximately 130 percent - and the Montaka short portfolio typically scaled down to approximately 30 percent – this strategy results in a net market exposure of approximately 100 percent most of the time.

Our Montaka variable net strategy strives for significant downside protection – but with minimal upside reduction. Focused on owning the world’s great and growing businesses when they are undervalued, while managing a portfolio of short positions in businesses that are deteriorating, misperceived, and overvalued, this strategy is our flagship long-short